Get this: A medieval manuscript, penned by a monk, mentions Robin Hood by name, as well as his “accomplices”:
“Around this time, according to popular opinion, a certain outlaw named Robin Hood, with his accomplices, infested Sherwood and other law-abiding areas of England with continuous robberies.”
So those wealth-redistributing men in tights were nothing more than common thieves.
Does it really come as a surprise?
Posted in I Used to Be a Superstar but Now I'm Just Me, It's Not Personal Only Business, The Next Thing You'll Be Telling Me Is That Wrestling Is Fake, Thieves and Liars, WWQD? (What Would Quixote Do?)
